Case 2304105/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J. Ayeni-Stevens v White Cube Art Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304105/2023
- Decision date
- 7 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J. Ayeni-Stevens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 7 June 2024, Employment Judge G. King heard the case at London South via CVP. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed by way of withdrawal.
The Claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal found that the claim had been presented outside the time limit in s.123 Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b) so as to allow the claim to proceed.
The claim described as being in relation to other payment, namely notice pay and bonus, was also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal found that it was presented outside the time limit in s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within that time limit. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed by way of withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the time limit in s.123 Equality Act 2010 and it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim in relation to other payment, identified as notice pay and bonus, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented outside the time limit in s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 when it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.