Case 2304109/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H. Fryer v 1) Gregory David Long 2) Adverweb 57 Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) Heard: London South Employment Tribunal (by Video) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304109/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H. Fryer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal added Adverweb 57 Ltd, in voluntary liquidation, as a second respondent. The first respondent attended the hearing with three witnesses, but the claimant did not attend, and the Tribunal could not contact her by telephone because no number was held on the file.
The Tribunal considered Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure and the available information about the claimant's absence. It noted that the claimant had not complied with case management orders, had not detailed the compensation sought, and that there was no documentary evidence before the Tribunal because the company records were with the liquidator. The Tribunal determined that it was in the interests of justice to dismiss the claimant's claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim form asserted unfair dismissal; all claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim form asserted unpaid holiday pay; all claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim form asserted notice pay; all claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim form asserted arrears of pay; all claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim form asserted other payments, but the judgment did not specify their nature; all claims were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.