Mr A Abdelrahman v Serco Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2304111/2022
Decision date: 19 September 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge D Wright
Venue: London South via CVP

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Abdelrahman

Respondent

Serco Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal heard the case at London South via CVP on 19 September 2023 before Employment Judge D Wright sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by an Employee Relations Officer.

The judgment records that the claimant's claim for wrongful and/or unlawful dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant's breach of contract claim was not well founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally, with written reasons only to follow if requested within the stated time limit.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Wrongful dismissal	The judgment describes this as a claim for wrongful and/or unlawful dismissal and states it was not well founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment states the breach of contract claim was not well founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.