Case 2304114/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Marlow v Namrick Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304114/2022
- Decision date
- 7 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Marlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 22 May 2023, the tribunal gave Miss E Marlow an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why her claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 22 November 2022 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. She did not attend the hearing listed for 5 June 2023. Namrick Ltd attended, and the tribunal tried to contact the claimant by telephone, but she was not reachable. A voicemail was left to confirm that the hearing was proceeding and to give her a number to contact the tribunal.
The tribunal allowed time for the claimant to respond to the voicemail, but she did not do so. The claim was therefore struck out pursuant to Rule 37(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The strike-out judgment does not state the underlying claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under Rule 37(c) and (d) after failure to comply with the tribunal's order and failure to actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.