Case 2304119/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rathnasingam v R Vikal — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304119/2018
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chong Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 14 April 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify any substantive hearing on the merits.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Chong struck out the claim on 23 March 2022.
No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment, and no substantive findings were made on the underlying merits of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it states only that 'the claim is struck out' because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.