Case 2304120/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Antwi-Bosiako, solicitor For the v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 2304120/2017
- Decision date
- 26 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Williams QC
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Antwi-Bosiako, solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in London South on 25 October 2018 before Employment Judge H Williams QC, the Claimant appeared by solicitor and the Respondent by counsel. The tribunal dealt with case management issues rather than the merits of the underlying complaints.
The Claimant withdrew her claims relating to alleged unlawful deductions from wages and alleged outstanding holiday pay. The tribunal dismissed those claims on withdrawal.
The tribunal also dismissed the claims against the Second and Third Respondent on the Claimant's withdrawal of them. It additionally permitted the Claimant to amend her Claim Form to add the allegations of sexual harassment identified in paragraph 2(ii), (iv), (vi), (vii) and (ix) to (xii) of the Further and Better Particulars dated 27 July 2018. No monetary remedy was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed this claim upon the Claimant's withdrawal of it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal dismissed this claim upon the Claimant's withdrawal of it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.