Case 2304129/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Idelbi (Counsel) For the v Mr S Tilston (PCS Union Representative) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304129/2017
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms J Forecast, Ms C Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Idelbi (Counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Claimant's disability discrimination claim was well founded and succeeded. The judgment does not set out further findings or reasoning in the extracted text beyond that conclusion.
The tribunal awarded £12,500.00 for injury to feelings and £3,804.74 interest on that head. It also awarded £1,507.06 as other compensation and £284.83 interest on that amount.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further substantive reasons appear in the extracted text supplied for this case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of disability discrimination was well founded and succeeds. It awards £12,500.00 for injury to feelings plus £3,804.74 interest, and £1,507.06 other compensation plus £284.83 interest. | Upheld | Disability | £18,097 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,097
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,507
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.