Case 2304130/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M. Aldridge v Thomson Snell and Passmore and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304130/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr. M. Aldridge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 November 2023, Judge Callan recorded that Mr Aldridge had made qualifying and protected disclosures within the meaning of ss.43B and 43C ERA 1996. The tribunal said that, on that basis, his automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.103A ERA could proceed.
The same record states that the wrongful dismissal claim could also proceed. The written judgment does not set out any final liability finding, dismissal, or remedy award.
The notes record that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment therefore functions as a short recorded ruling rather than a full merits decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant had made qualifying and protected disclosures within ss.43B and 43C ERA 1996, and that his automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.103A ERA could proceed. No final merits decision is recorded in this written judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim could proceed. No final merits decision is recorded in this written judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- ss.43B and 43C ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.