Case 2304132/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Mallon v KH Recruitment Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304132/2022
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Mallon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr C Mallon's claim against KH Recruitment Limited. The reason given was procedural rather than a determination of the merits: after a preliminary hearing on 10 February 2025, the claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £500.
The order was sent to the claimant on 19 February 2025, but the deposit had not been paid by 31 March 2025, which was the deadline in the order. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Because the claim was struck out, the hearing listed for 28 July 2025 to 30 July 2025 will not take place. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type beyond the case being listed on GOV.UK as a disability discrimination matter.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to pay a £500 deposit ordered after a preliminary hearing on 10 February 2025, despite the order being sent on 19 February 2025 and payment being due by 31 March 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.