Case 2304142/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr R Najmudin v Greenwich Theatre Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304142/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Representation
- Venue
- South London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr R Najmudin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at South London Hearing Centre by CVP on 14 May 2024 before Employment Judge McLaren. The claimant, Dr R Najmudin, brought claims against Greenwich Theatre Limited for unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear that claim.
The tribunal also dismissed the unlawful deduction from wages claim because the subject matter of the claim fell outside the definition of wages. It again held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. No remedy or award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the subject matter of the claim fell outside the definition of wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.