Case 2304149/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Masters v Malcolm Horton & Co — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304149/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Masters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in London South by CVP on 6 March 2025, Employment Judge Emery found that Mrs M Masters was unfairly dismissed by Malcolm Horton & Co. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's complaint in respect of failure to pay holiday pay was well-founded. The short written judgment does not set out the factual reasoning in detail and does not record any separate monetary award, basic award, compensatory award, interest, or total award in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no monetary award is stated in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint about failure to pay holiday pay was well-founded. The written record does not state any separate award or amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.