Case 2304155/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Central London Plumbers Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304155/2022
- Decision date
- 28 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 17 November 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge therefore made a determination on part of the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £3,350.00 gross in respect of that claim.
The judgment records that the remaining claims were to continue to a hearing, with a notice of hearing to be issued and copied to the respondent. The respondent was only entitled to take part in that hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge hearing the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £3,350.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.