Case 2304158/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Deans v Emphasis Inventories — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304158/2022
- Decision date
- 10 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Deans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 February 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr A Deans an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why his complaint should not be struck out. The stated reason was that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order requiring him to show cause why the claim should not be struck out for failing to engage with the ACAS early conciliation procedure.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore struck out all complaints. The judgment is dated 10 May 2023 and is signed by Employment Judge Heath Date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action beyond referring to the claimant's 'complaint' and stating that all complaints were struck out for failure to engage with the ACAS early conciliation procedure and failure to respond to the Tribunal's show-cause order. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.