Case 2304158/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. S. Debenham and Others v Star Leisure Limited t/a Fortuna Entertainment (in Administration) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304158/2023
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs. S. Debenham and Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered complaints under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent had failed to comply with the consultation requirements in section 188. Employment Judge Sudra, sitting alone, heard the matter on 24 July 2024. The respondents did not attend. The judgment records that the claimant’s complaints were well founded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 189 TULR(C)A 1992 that the respondent failed to comply with section 188. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and made a protective award for a 90-day protected period, but the judgment did not quantify any monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189 TULR(C)A 1992
- protective award
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.