Case 2304159/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Khan v P2M Coffee Limited and 1 other — 2020

Case reference: 2304159/2019
Decision date: 2 August 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Nash
Panel members: Mr N Aziz, Mr A Peart

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr J Khan

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The written judgment records three liability findings. Employment Judge Nash, sitting with Mr N Aziz and Mr A Peart, found that the first and second respondents subjected Mr J Khan to detriments because he made a protected disclosure, contrary to s47B(1) and (1A) Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also found that the first respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to s13 Employment Rights Act 1996.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The tribunal found that the first and second respondents subjected the claimant to detriments on the ground that he made a protected disclosure, contrary to s47B(1) and (1A) Employment Rights Act 1996.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found that the first respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to s13 Employment Rights Act 1996.	Upheld	—	—
Other	Mapped to other because the judgment records a failure to provide written itemised pay statements under s8 Employment Rights Act 1996, which has no dedicated enum category.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.