Case 2304162/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Neville Senior v Servo Securities Ltd. — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304162/2022
- Decision date
- 26 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harley
- Panel members
- Dr Chacko, Ms Thompson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Neville Senior
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant made no qualifying disclosures in respect of criminal offences or conduct, failures to comply with legal obligations, endangerment of health and safety, or deliberate concealment of such matters under section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It therefore dismissed the protected disclosure detriment claims and the automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A.
The tribunal also dismissed the victimisation complaint under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, which concerned an alleged protected act of disclosing racial bias or discrimination and alleged detriments including dismissal. The unauthorised deductions from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal found the claimant made no qualifying disclosures under section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismissed all claims for alleged detriments suffered as a result of making protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The automatic unfair dismissal claim for making protected disclosures under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | The complaint of victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 was on the grounds of having performed a protected act, namely disclosing racial bias or discrimination, and then suffering detriments including dismissal. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.