Loading…

Mr S Martins, Legal Executive For the v Respondent — Employment Tribunal 2019 | Tribunal Watch

Case 2304169/2017 · Employment Tribunal

Mr S Martins, Legal Executive For the v Respondent — 2019

Case reference: 2304169/2017
Decision date: 12 February 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Morton Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr S Martins, Legal Executive For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 12 February 2019 at London South, Employment Judge Morton recorded in case numbers 2304169/2017 and 2301133/2018 that Mr R Ewujowoh was, at the material time, a disabled person within the meaning of s 6 Equality Act 2010. That is the only substantive finding stated in the extracted text.

The written record says the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days. The extracted text does not record any further merits outcome, compensation, or other remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The extracted text records only that the claimant was at the material time a disabled person within the meaning of s 6 Equality Act 2010. No further merits outcome or remedy is stated in the written record supplied here.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.