Case 2304169/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Hexagon Housing Association Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304169/2018
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mrs A Sadler, Mr J Gautrey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at London South Employment Tribunal on 16 August 2019 before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish, sitting with Mrs A Sadler and Mr J Gautrey. The claimant, Mrs N Ismail, and the respondent, Hexagon Housing Association, were both represented in person.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the claim of race discrimination was not well founded and was dismissed. No further factual findings, liability reasoning, or remedy assessment are set out in the written record because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of race discrimination was not well founded and was dismissed. No separate remedy was recorded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.