Case 2304171/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. J. Harris v The Raphael Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304171/2018
- Decision date
- 8 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. J. Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sage sat alone at London South Croydon on 8 January 2019. The claimant, Ms J. Harris, did not attend. The respondent was represented by Mr Self of Counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The extracted text does not specify the individual causes of action, so the substantive claims cannot be separated more precisely from this judgment record alone.
The tribunal also ordered the claimant to pay the respondent costs of £5,000 under Regulation 76(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The note to the judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The underlying claim types are not specified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.