Case 2304176/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Dascalu v Abellio London Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304176/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S Dengate, Mr. M Cann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Dascalu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously decided that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. It found that the claimant was fairly dismissed.
The tribunal also decided that the disability discrimination complaints were not well-founded. It dismissed the complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability.
No remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and that the claimant was fairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.