Case 2304180/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Trafford First v The Three Crowns Trading Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) Second Respondent: Rupert Anthony Burstow — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304180/2023
- Decision date
- 13 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Trafford First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard at Croydon by CVP on 13 March 2025 before Employment Judge Lumby. Neither party attended the final hearing listed for 25 July 2024 or the further hearing listed for 13 March 2025. The judgment records that the claimant had been given a letter dated 26 July 2024 offering an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to actively pursue it.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued; it did not separate out outcomes for individual heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued; it did not separate out outcomes for individual heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.