Case 2304180/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Farley v Apple Leisure Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304180/2024
- Decision date
- 12 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yardley Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Farley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay was well founded. The Respondent had made a series of unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages between 13 November 2023 and 31 January 2025, and was ordered to pay the gross sum deducted, £3,383.69, with the Claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The tribunal also found that when the proceedings were begun the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. Finding no exceptional circumstances making such an award unjust or inequitable, the tribunal made an award equal to two weeks' gross pay of £830.76 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
A further complaint that the Respondent had failed to give the Claimant an itemised pay statement contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded, but no monetary award was made in respect of it. The total sum awarded was £4,214.45. Written reasons were not provided in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages in the period 13 November 2023 to 31 January 2025. Award is the gross sum deducted; claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £3,384 |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award of two weeks' gross pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002. Not a standalone claim_type in the locked taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £831 |
| Other | Complaint that the Respondent failed to provide an itemised pay statement under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded. No monetary award was made in respect of this. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages in the period 13 November 2023 to 31 January 2025. Award is the gross sum deducted; claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £3,384 |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award of two weeks' gross pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002. Not a standalone claim_type in the locked taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £831 |
| Other | Complaint that the Respondent failed to provide an itemised pay statement under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded. No monetary award was made in respect of this. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,214
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.