Case 2304182/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Fisher v Kent County Council, — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304182/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Fisher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 April 2025 the Tribunal wrote to Ms L Fisher asking whether, in light of the outcome of the Harpur Trust litigation, she wished to pursue her claim or withdraw it. The letter was returned because she was no longer at that address, and she did not provide an alternative correspondence address.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had not advised it of any alternate address. On that basis, it concluded that she did not appear to be actively pursuing the claim and struck it out.
The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded cause of action or record any findings on the merits. It is a strike-out decision only, approved by Employment Judge Andrews on 7 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter of 14 April 2025 asking whether, in light of the outcome of the Harpur Trust litigation, she wished to pursue the claim or withdraw. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.