Case 2304188/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L T Johnstone v Clear Flow Water Solutions Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304188/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L T Johnstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 9 August 2023 and was determined under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made on the papers.
The tribunal found that Mr L T Johnstone was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It recorded that he was 32 years old at the date of dismissal and had completed two years of service, so he was entitled to two weeks' pay capped at £571 per week, giving a redundancy payment of £1,142.00 in total. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,142
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.