Case 2304189/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Alonso Bombin v Mash Media Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304189/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Alonso Bombin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the joined case numbers 2304189/2022 and 2300884/2023 at a preliminary hearing on 17 October 2023 before Employment Judge Self Appearances. It amended the Claimant's name to Ms M Alonso Bombin and dealt with the two joined case numbers together.
Case number 2304189/2022 was dismissed because the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider it under paragraph 3(c) of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. The judgment does not set out any further substantive findings on that case number.
The Tribunal also found that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. It ordered the Respondent, Mash Media Group Limited, to pay the Claimant £2,084 as damages for breach of contract. The judgment records that the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant would have to pay tax on it as post-employment pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Case number 2304189/2022 was dismissed because the Tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider it under paragraph 3(c) of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was found well-founded. The Tribunal awarded £2,084 damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant would have to pay tax on the payment as post-employment pay. | Upheld | — | £2,084 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,084
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.