Case 2304197/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Hyland v Ace Auto Mall Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304197/2018
- Decision date
- 16 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Hyland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after no response was received from the Respondent, Ace Auto Mall Limited. The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from the Claimant's wages and awarded Mr F Hyland £615 net for that claim.
The tribunal also held that the Claimant's claim for damages for breach of contract in relation to unpaid expenses succeeded, and awarded £149.31. The judgment records a total sum awarded of £764.31. No further reasoning, legal tests, or remedy breakdown beyond those figures appears in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. No response was received from the Respondent. | Upheld | — | £615 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages for breach of contract in relation to unpaid expenses succeeded. Rule 21 judgment; no response was received from the Respondent. | Upheld | — | £149 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £764
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.