Case 2304198/2022 · Employment Tribunal
L Harris (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304198/2022
- Decision date
- 25 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- J Cook, R Singh
Parties
1 namedClaimant
L Harris (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South by CVP on 22, 23, 24 and 25 April 2024 before Employment Judge Anderson with panel members J Cook and R Singh. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the specified period.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of direct discrimination and dismissed the claim of failure to make a reasonable adjustment. The written record does not set out factual findings, legal tests, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of direct discrimination is dismissed. The protected characteristic is inferred from the listing category and the reasonable adjustment claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of failure to make a reasonable adjustment is dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.