Case 2304199/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Gardiner v Graham Care Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304199/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs G Gardiner
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying dispute. It dealt only with whether the claim against the second respondent should remain in the proceedings. By letter dated 02 February 2023, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim against the second respondent should not be struck out, on the bases that the second respondent was not the employer and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim against the second respondent. The hearing fixed for 20-21 June 2023 was to continue against the first respondent only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only records a strike-out application against the second respondent and does not restate the underlying claim type; this entry follows the case listing's unfair dismissal category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.