Case 2304200/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Haywood Ambersley v Oxygen Bidco Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304200/2018
- Decision date
- 6 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Haywood Ambersley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Haywood Ambersley brought a claim against Oxygen Bidco Limited. The respondent did not appear at the hearing on 30 October 2019. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Oxygen Bidco Limited and recorded that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,000 for unpaid wages, £350 for notice pay, and £900 for unpaid holiday pay. The total award was £3,250. The judgment does not contain further findings or a detailed explanation of liability beyond the award recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unpaid wages of £2,000 and notice pay of £350. The judgment does not set out separate reasoning or a more specific legal label for these sums. | Upheld | — | £2,350 |
| Working time regulations | Awarded for unpaid holiday pay of £900. | Upheld | — | £900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.