Case 2304210/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Yah v Beap Restaurants Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304210/2023
- Decision date
- 30 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Yah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Croydon by video hearing on 26 July 2024, Employment Judge Robinson dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal claim against Beap Restaurants Limited. The tribunal decided that the claim should be struck out because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service, which is required for an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No compensation or other monetary award was made, and the decision was sent to the parties on 30 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service, as required by section 108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.