Case 2304211/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ablett – Claimant’s son For the v Ms Swords-Kieley - Counsel — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304211/2019
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Panel members
- Ms S Gledhill, Mr D Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ablett – Claimant’s son For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat by video at London South on 27 to 29 January 2021 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke, with Ms S Gledhill and Mr D Rogers as lay members. In its written record the tribunal stated that Ms S Ablett’s claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and age discrimination failed and were dismissed.
The extracted judgment text does not set out the tribunal’s reasons, because it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy or award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.