Case 2304222/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Scott v Gillingham Football Club and 4 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304222/2018
- Decision date
- 14 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
6 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment dated 14 June 2019, signed by Employment Judge Ferguson Date. The judgment records that the claimant, Ms L Scott, brought proceedings against five respondent entities including Gillingham Football Club Limited and related organisations.
The tribunal stated that the claim succeeds. The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type or types, set out findings of fact, or explain the legal basis for the decision beyond the standard Rule 21 template wording.
The judgment also states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is given in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment; the text does not identify the substantive claim type(s) or reasoning. It states only that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.