Case 2304227/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Reliance Tours (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304227/2019
- Decision date
- 26 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Hearing
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response and did not attend the remote hearing. The case was listed as a preliminary hearing, but it was treated as a final hearing under rule 48, and judgment was entered for the claimant under rule 21 by Employment Judge K Andrews on 26 June 2020.
The tribunal declared that Mr L Sim was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £12,690. It also ordered the respondent to pay him forthwith damages for unpaid notice pay of £5,769.24, unpaid wages of £2,534.25, and unpaid holiday of £480.77, giving a total of £8,784.26 for those sums. The judgment records the monetary awards but gives no separate reasons beyond the respondent's failure to respond.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Declared as a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £12,690 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for unpaid notice pay, stated as 12 weeks gross. | Upheld | — | £5,769 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages, stated as 37 days gross. | Upheld | — | £2,534 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday, stated as 1 week gross. | Upheld | — | £481 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,784
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.