Case 2304232/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Wilder v David Lloyd Leisure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304232/2019
- Decision date
- 24 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Wilder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs Wilder was neither an employee nor a worker within the meaning of s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996.
It also found that she was not in employment within the meaning of s.83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010. On those threshold findings, the tribunal dismissed the claims. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claims after finding the claimant was neither an employee nor a worker within the meaning of s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claims after finding the claimant was not in employment within the meaning of s.83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claims were dismissed following threshold findings on employment status; no separate reasons for this claim are given in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.