Case 2304241/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M A Cordero Cardenas v ISS Facility Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304241/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M A Cordero Cardenas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint for unauthorised deductions from wages. The Tribunal considered the written representations and payroll documents, finding that the claimant worked five seven-hour shifts per week at £8.50 per hour, giving a daily rate of £59.50 and a weekly rate of £297.50. The claimant had been unfit for work from 24 December 2018 to 23 April 2019, was certified fit for light duties from 24 April 2019, and the respondent did not provide work until 31 May 2019 after misunderstanding the GP advice.
The Tribunal accepted that statutory sick pay arrears had been paid and that, after earlier payments, 16 days' outstanding pay remained due, amounting to £952 gross. It also found that holiday pay totalling £595 had already been paid for holiday the claimant had been unable to take while ill, and that the claimant remained entitled to take that holiday later. On the Tribunal's calculation, £952 less £595 left £357 gross due, but the respondent had paid £417 on 4 December 2019 and had separately identified a £59.50 underpayment, producing a net overpayment of 50p.
The claim therefore succeeded to the extent of a declaration that the unauthorised deduction complaint was well-founded, but no money was awarded. The Tribunal refused interest because there was an overpayment, and refused a 25% Acas Code uplift because there was no evidence of a grievance or failure to follow the Code.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages complaint under s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded and a declaration was made under s.24 ERA, but the Tribunal found no sum was due to the claimant after accounting for payments and overpayments. | Upheld | — | £0 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.