Case 2304258/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Livingstone (Solicitor) For the v Osterley Park Hotel Ltd and RS Hotels Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304258/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Livingstone (Solicitor) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is the tribunal's judgment on remedy in case no. 2304258/2019. The claimant was Mrs K Pollington and the respondents were Osterley Park Hotel Limited and RS Hotels Limited. The respondents did not appear. Employment Judge Hyams-Parish ordered the respondents to pay the claimant a total of £6,963.53.
The award was made up of a basic award of £4,016.81, notice pay of £2,239.68, holiday pay of £357.04, and £350 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on the sums awarded, if any.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The text supplied records the remedy only and does not include the tribunal's underlying liability findings, but the award is consistent with an upheld unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | This is a remedy judgment only. The written record does not set out the liability reasons, but it records an award consistent with an unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | £6,964 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,964
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,017
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,947
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.