Case 2304308/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Damani v Wilcomatic Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304308/2022
- Decision date
- 14 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Damani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment in the claim brought by Mr M Damani against Wilcomatic Limited. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 27 February 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with a tribunal order and had not actively pursued the claim.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, had failed to make sufficient representations, or had failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The hearing fixed for 14 April 2023 was vacated and did not take place. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 37 strike-out decision and does not identify the underlying cause of action. The reasons refer to an order dated 5 December 2023, which appears inconsistent with the judgment date of 4 April 2023; that date is transcribed as extracted. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.