Case 2304315/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Zamouri v AEMD Develop UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304315/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Zamouri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that determination could properly be made on the papers. The claimant, Ms A Zamouri, brought claims against AEMD Develop UK LTD and the tribunal dealt with the claim without a contested response from the respondent.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £15,384.64 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,166.67.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713.00. The separate breach of contract claim in respect of expenses was not contested, and the tribunal ordered compensation of £466.79.
The total sum awarded was £21,731.10.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £15,384.64 gross. | Upheld | — | £15,385 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,166.67. | Upheld | — | £4,167 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,713.00. | Upheld | — | £1,713 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for breach of contract in respect of expenses was not contested, and the tribunal ordered compensation of £466.79. | Upheld | — | £467 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,731
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.