Case 2304338/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Linstead v Peasmarsh Place (Country Care) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304338/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Linstead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims on 3 December 2018 for unfair dismissal, notice pay, arrears of pay and holiday pay. The tribunal made case-management directions on 14 March 2019 requiring exchange of documents and witness statements before the 2 September 2019 hearing date.
The respondent told the tribunal on 12 August 2019 that it had received no communication from the claimant and that she had not complied with the directions for exchange of documents and relevant documents. Employment Judge Martin wrote to the claimant on 27 August 2019 asking for a response within 7 days, but no response was received. The hearing listed for 2 September 2019 was then postponed for lack of judicial resources.
The respondent wrote again on 28 August 2019 saying none of the orders had been complied with. By letter dated 7 September 2019, Employment Judge Hyde warned that the tribunal was considering striking out the claim of its own initiative for failure to comply with an order and invited objections within 7 days. No correspondence was received from the claimant in response to that warning.
Applying Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal was satisfied that the claimant had failed to comply with an order of the tribunal and struck out all of the claims under the case number. No liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) for failure to comply with an Order of the Tribunal; no merits determination. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim struck out with the other claims under Rule 37(1)(c); no merits determination. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay claim struck out with the other claims under Rule 37(1)(c); no merits determination. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim struck out with the other claims under Rule 37(1)(c); no merits determination. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.