Case 2304349/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Spotswood v AC Entertainment Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304349/2018
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr S Huggins, Ms E Coke
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Spotswood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed Miss S Spotswood's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages. It upheld her holiday pay complaint and awarded £2,383.42 for unpaid holiday pay. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
On victimisation, the tribunal upheld the complaint against both respondents only in relation to issuing the claimant with a worker's agreement in which she was described as a dep/stand-in. The remaining victimisation complaints were dismissed. A remedy hearing was listed by CVP for 19 July 2021 at 10.00am.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint succeeded and the Claimant was awarded £2,383.42 for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,383 |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint succeeded against both Respondents only in respect of issuing the Claimant with a worker's agreement describing her as a dep/stand-in. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | The other victimisation complaints failed and were dismissed; the written record gives no further detail. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,383
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.