Case 2304356/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Buczynska v v Oakam Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304356/2018
- Decision date
- 22 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Buczynska v
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Ms M Buczynska's claim of unfair dismissal against Oakam Limited (in administration) succeeded. The hearing took place on 22 April 2022 before Judge T Lawrence, acting as an Employment Judge, with no appearance for the respondent.
The written judgment does not set out the tribunal's full reasons. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The written record therefore confirms the outcome but does not identify the factual findings or legal analysis that led to liability.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £29,326.84 in total. The judgment does not break that figure into separate heads of loss, nor does it identify any basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other component in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning or any split of the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,327
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.