Case 2304356/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304356/2019
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary-issue judgment by Employment Judge Balogun sitting at London South on 21 July 2020. The tribunal dismissed all claims for want of jurisdiction after finding that they had been presented out of time.
The tribunal also found that there were no just and equitable reasons to extend time. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made, because the claims failed at the jurisdiction stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment is on a preliminary issue only. It dismisses all claims for want of jurisdiction because they were presented out of time and because there were no just and equitable reasons to extend time. The race-discrimination claim type is inferred from the case listing and category, as the body of the judgment does not itemise the individual claims. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable reasons to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.