Case 2304360/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Tilly Humphrey v MyoMaster Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304360/2022
- Decision date
- 19 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Tilly Humphrey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D Wright, sitting alone at London South via CVP on 19 July 2023, recorded that by consent the respondent’s name was amended to Myomaster Ltd. The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s redundancy pay claim, stating that it was not well founded.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages in the gross sum of £2,469.37 and ordered payment of that amount forthwith. The judgment also directed that, on receipt of the money, the claimant was to account to HMRC for any tax or National Insurance contributions owed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal said the redundancy pay claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £2,469.37 and ordered that sum to be paid forthwith. | Upheld | — | £2,469 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,469
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.