In person For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 2304362/2018
Decision date: 14 September 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
Venue: London South
Panel members: Ms J Cook, Ms J Saunders

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr S Elliott's claims against Brighton, Hove & Sussex 6th Form College were heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27 August 2021 before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish, with Ms J Cook and Ms J Saunders as members. The tribunal's unanimous judgment dismissed the claim of constructive unfair dismissal under s.95 and 98 ERA 1996, the direct discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010, the victimisation claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010, and the claim under s.80H(1) ERA 1996.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment records this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal under s.95 and 98 ERA 1996.	Dismissed	—	—
Age discrimination	The written record says only 'direct discrimination' under s.13 Equality Act 2010; age is inferred from the gov.uk listing for the case.	Dismissed	Age	—
Victimisation	Claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010.	Dismissed	—	—
Flexible working	Claim recorded under s.80H(1) ERA 1996.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.