Case 2304366/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ipus Avila v Pubs For The Future Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304366/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 28 November 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Tsamados determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing on 10 May 2023 was cancelled.
On the substantive claims, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded £516 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £108 gross for that claim.
The total sum awarded was £624 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £516 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and made an award under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £108 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £624
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.