Case 2304372/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Treays v Analytic Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304372/2018
- Decision date
- 14 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Treays
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 9 January 2019, the tribunal gave Mr H Treays an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The reason given was that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant was not entitled to bring the complaint.
Mr Treays did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim for notice pay was still listed for hearing on 12 March 2019. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the tribunal found the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant was not entitled to bring it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.