Case 2304380/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Silverlock v Gelato Gusto Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304380/2024
- Decision date
- 27 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Silverlock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 October 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 23 May 2025 and had not actively pursued the claim. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal concluded that it was not possible for a fair hearing to take place on the dates listed. This was a disability discrimination claim, and the hearing listed for 28 October 2025 was to determine whether the claimant was a disabled person. The claim was therefore struck out.
The hearings fixed for 28 October 2025 and 18-20 March 2026 were vacated and will not take place. No substantive merits determination or remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 23 May 2025 and had not actively pursued the claim. The 28 October 2025 hearing had been listed to determine whether the claimant was a disabled person. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.