Miss R Uddin v Antidote — 2023

Case reference: 2304382/2022
Decision date: 18 April 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tsamados Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss R Uddin

Respondent

Antidote

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Miss R Uddin, brought a claim against Antidote in the London South Employment Tribunals. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a full hearing.

The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss R Uddin £742 gross. The judgment states that the claimant was no longer required to attend the hearing listed for 10 May 2023.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 judgment: the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a determination on the papers. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £742 gross.	Upheld	—	£742

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £742; across all upheld claims
Compensatory award: £742; compensatory remedy recorded

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.