Case 2304386/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Coombs v National Home Move Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304386/2022
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Coombs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 23 March 2023, the tribunal gave Miss T Coombs an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The tribunal said strike out was being contemplated because it appeared she had been employed by National Home Move Ltd for less than two years.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Ramsden therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint in the judgment dated 12 May 2023.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims stayed listed for a case management hearing on 6 September 2023 at 14:00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter dated 23 March 2023. The tribunal said strike out was contemplated because it appeared the claimant had been employed for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.