Case 2304387/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Hignett - Counsel for 1st Respondent Mr Kirk - Counsel for 2d Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304387/2018
- Decision date
- 27 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anne Martin
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Anne Martin at London South on 27 March 2019. Ms A Shillingford appeared in person. The 1st Respondent was represented by Mr Hignett and the 2nd Respondent by Mr Kirk.
The tribunal decided that the Claimant’s claim against the 2nd Respondent had been presented out of time. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for that claim to have been presented in time.
On that basis, the claim against the 2nd Respondent was dismissed. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing. The claim against the 2nd Respondent was presented out of time, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.